As I think I showed quite well in my last
post on evil and suffering, we perhaps don't have good enough reason to think
that there is a logical problem with the simultaneous existence of God, evil
and suffering. Nonetheless, I think that if we’re all totally honest, there’s
more here than straight logic.
Even the most logical of us surely battle
our emotions from time to time. For all intents and purposes your reason tells
you one thing, but your emotions say something else completely. And so it often
is for evil and suffering. Even if we can see logically no incompatibility
between the existence of God with the existence of terrible moral evils or
seemingly pointless but awful suffering, we still feel like all these wrongs
mean there can't be a right. We'll even go as far as to say that life is
meaningless, "a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying
nothing" as Shakespeare wrote. We go this far, perhaps, because we hope that
our emotional pain (whether our own or lived vicariously) will be numbed or
eased. Behind this might be a hope that if we can convince ourselves that it's
all just part of life, part of our "meaningless" existence, then we
can just move on and not have to worry about it. We want peace - and when
life's evils seem to keep us from this peace, we try to convince ourselves that
there is no evil at all. Just existence.
If we take a step back however, we can see
where we go wrong. We are telling ourselves these things. We are
the ones trying to redefine what we understand as evil, and for our own
convenience no less. The evils and endless sufferings of life impact us
emotionally - and we respond based on our emotions. Thus, our emotions govern
our actions and control what we believe or how we live.
I think we would all agree that our
emotions are important. Clearly, they can be very helpful as we make big
decisions, as we relate to others, and as we undergo self-discovery. Our
emotions can tell us much. But they can also mislead and interfere. We have all
had times where our emotions have gotten the better of us, made us say or do
something we ended up regretting or even changed so suddenly that we wished we
had never listened to them in the first place. Indeed, as helpful as emotions can
be, they are not the be-all, end-all, and must be cautiously watched, and
constructively questioned and criticized.
When it comes to our worldview, (that is,
how we see and understand the world) we must be incredibly careful that our emotions
do not govern us. Why? Because how you see and understand the world will
determine how you live and how you relate to those around you, and will in a
very real way lead you (and others) either to success or to destruction. And
even more importantly, if how you live and thus what you believe have
consequences not only in this life but any life that may follow this one, then
your worldview (led by your emotions, if you let them) will have great and
lasting (even, possibly, eternal) consequences.
Our emotions can only tell us so much.
Ultimately, they cannot be what we base our worldview on - and so when it comes
to the existence of God, indeed perhaps the most important question of anyone's
life, we cannot let our contempt for evil and suffering guide us to say,
simply, "there is no God"… That, I think, is foolishness.
And so our emotions, though helpful, must
not be the end decision maker in our lives.
Though I think the above case is sound, I
know still the depth and power of emotions and don't pretend to make light of
them nor their ability to guide and determine our minds. I think a future post
should deal with the superiority of the Christian God in these matters, as I
think that there is still a lot to deal with when it comes to evil and
suffering, and I also think that the God of the Bible answers and satisfies
these problems better than any (largely through the person of Jesus Christ, God
in a human body, who himself suffers and endures evil unlike anyone else).
For now though, I would plead with you that
you do not let your emotions decide such an important question as the existence
of a loving God. Please, keep thinking. And my hope is that instead of a
resentfulness towards the thought of a "so-called" loving God who
allows evil, you would see such a being as the good comforter in the midst of a
world filled with evil, and that you would see pain and suffering as the
"megaphone" (as CS Lewis puts it) to a sleeping and broken world that
He uses to awaken and heal it.
Keep thinking.
Corey
What this post made me think about was the simple fact that we can even define "evil" or "suffering".
ReplyDeleteIn a god-less worldview there is no reason to hold to any moral standard (that I can see) or have any will to ease the pain and suffering of others. Objective morals serve almost no bio-evolutionary purpose. The fact that evil and suffering is so reprehensible to humans is an extremely strong indicator that God does exist.
sportsfan2 brings up a good point.
ReplyDeleteSome may believe that absolute evil and good do not exist. But this does not fit with the reality of our conscience, which tells us apart from what we think is right and wrong that certain things are good and certain things are evil (although our conscience can be seared and changed).
I believe this is a great clue to God, and testimony of the truth of the Bible, in that sin exists in everyone, and sin's existence is shown when our conscience accuses us of certain deeds we've committed(lying for example), and that eventually it will stop accusing us altogether if we continue in those deeds and resist those accusations(a long period of lying will eventually cause us to lie without giving it a second thought), which the Bible calls a seared conscience and a hardened heart.